Following a lunch break, defense attorney Robert Alessi began cross-examining Aperture digital forensics expert Shanon Burgess.
Alessi grilled Burgess on the possibility of scientific bias as it relates to Burgess’ investigation into data recorded on Karen Read’s SUV and John O’Keefe’s iPhone.
“So biases are to be avoided in the application of scientific matters and methods,” Alessi said. “Because they can lead to inconclusions in science, right?”
“Right,” Burgess answered.
“And even though they’re to be avoided, you called this case a homicide,” Alessi said. “Even before you began your alleged scientific testing, isn’t that true?”
Burgess testified he did not recall using the word “homicide,” prompting Alessi to provide a copy of Burgess’ report.
“On page four, footnote three, it states, ‘Evidence review by the defense counsel, [regarding] O’Keefe, MV homicide,’” Alessi said. “Did I read that correctly?”
“Yes,” Burgess said. “You did.”
Alessi then grilled Burgess on an inconsistency regarding his college education found on his resume and LinkedIn page. Burgess’ admitted to multiple “errors” on his resume indicating he possesses a bachelor’s degree, conceding to Alessi that his highest level of education is an associate’s degree.
“If an expert witness can’t even be truthful about their own background why should anyone believe what they say,” Grace Edwards, a Massachusetts defense lawyer, told Fox News Digital. “Credibility is the most important factor to support their professional opinion. What a contrast to when Attorney [Adam] Lally goes through his experts education and experience. I can’t believe [Burgess] was even qualified as an expert when we have seen the defense experts put through the wringer.”
